Skip to content

Jason Aizkalns

My feedback

4 results found

  1. 2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Love the idea. The consideration on our end is that Google has limitation on how many styled maps are loaded in a day. While I don’t see this as a huge use case, it’s what we have to consider before just implementing this.

    Jason Aizkalns shared this idea  · 
  2. 2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jason Aizkalns commented  · 

    For #1, have you tried using Settings > Map Height? Try taking it off Auto -- I've found some users do better after taking this off auto -- especially laptop users.

  3. 32 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jason Aizkalns commented  · 

    As a follow up, these built-in analytics could be extension of the dialogue/content box that pops-up after you click on polygon/shape in the current release (March 2014). Currently, this box populates with "Accounts: [Total Accounts]" -- further, it appears to have a two-way binding (i.e., when you drag to update the shape and lasso additional points/markers, the content box updates immediately). The addition of other metrics, such as, totals by priority flags (low, medium, high), totals by dollars/potential, etc. would be valuable.

    These features, in combination with the the new "Change Ownership" functionality would make Geopointe a very attractive territory alignment solution. It would not have the automatic optimization/algorithms as alluded to in #1 above, however, for various low-scale, ad-hoc adjustments, I think the features/additions mentioned would satisfy many user requirements/needs.

    Jason Aizkalns shared this idea  · 
  4. 85 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Jason Aizkalns supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base